Compare and Contrast Buchanan and Monderman’s Approaches...

Compare and contrast Buchanan and Monderman’s approaches to the production of social order in public spaces. Public spaces are places which we have to share with others and where apply shared sets of values or expectations about how people should behave. Social order is very important in social life. Order is part of the way people practice their social existence. It is about how individuals fit together with others and with things around them. Ordering is all the time practised by people and is central to social life. Social order is not easy to make, it involves a lot of things like practices, making everything and everyone fit together and also having in mind ideas about the past and the future (Silva, 2009). Social order needs to†¦show more content†¦The purpose was to design towns in a way that there could be an access for a lot of motor vehicles and at the same time sufficient level of life in towns (Silva, 2009). In this report Buchanan’s idea was to keep separate ‘working, shopping and leisure form the ‘corridors’ where the traffic would move†™ (as cited in Silva, 2009). At this point there was a choice between not allowing any more cars in towns and just reconstructing them. After the mid-1960s, in towns started a separation of people from the vehicles. Sometimes it was very strict, when people where pushed away in residential blocks (Silva, 2009). In Buchanan’s Report traffic has a dynamic role in shaping the way places are designed, the way people live and interact with each other and also with surroundings. He looks at the traffic as something dangerous and because of that it needs to be separated and restricted by rules forced through visible displays in space. His report was accepted by public. Later government commissioned work and its way of road planning has influenced almost half a century of road design in England. There was a privilege for motor vehicles and pedestrians with cyclist were marginalised (Silva, 2009). After years of separating pedestrians from traffic, Monderman’s suggested the ‘shared space’ philosophy, which was concentrated on different approaches to the public spaces and highways from Buchanan Report. The aim of Monderman’s thesis was toShow MoreRelatedSocial Order in Public Spaces: Buchanan and Monderman`s Approaches1649 Words   |  7 PagesTMA04 Word count 1472. Compare and contrast Buchanan and Monderman`s approaches to the production of social order in public spaces?. This essay will look at the ordering of motor vehicles and pedestrians ,in order to compare and contrast Colin Buchanan’s Traffic in towns 1963 government commissioned report, with Hans Monderman’s thesis 1982.It will also look briefly at further accounts of social order that of philosopher Micheal Foucault’s macro dimensions of social life and sociologistsRead MoreWhat is Social Order? Essay examples1248 Words   |  5 Pageswill compare and contrast two social science views about the ordering of social life. It will look at what social order is and how it effects our daily lives and explore the differences and similarities between the work of Erving Goffman and Michel Foucault. It will consider Buchanan’s and Monderman’s views on ordering public space to highlight Goffman’s focus on the way individuals interact with each other and Foucault’s emphasis on authoritative knowledge by authorities or experts. Social order